2025-12-26 16:26:20

Different tokens can develop in parallel around the same narrative track, but the one with the most potential should be the one with the broadest coverage. Taking $onepiece as an example, its ecosystem breadth is obviously larger than that of a single character token. Although $luffy has a solid fundamental and is quite popular, it is essentially still confined to a more niche area. This is why many experienced players prefer comprehensive tokens with large ecosystem capacity and rich application scenarios—they have greater imagination space and stronger risk resistance.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CompoundPersonality

· 2h ago

Ecological breadth is the key, single-coin players will eventually fall into the trap --- Luffy's popularity is just that—popularity. Still too shallow. A comprehensive ecosystem like OnePiece can survive longer --- To put it simply, it's a capacity issue. How long can a small narrative last? Making quick money is possible, but long-term success depends on the ecosystem --- Experienced players never judge by single-point popularity; they focus entirely on ecosystem capacity. Only by understanding this can you play well --- Diversified tokens are indeed more risk-resistant. Niche sector tokens are like paper—prick them and they break --- OnePiece and Luffy are not even in the same league; there's no need to compare --- This logic is sound. Ecosystem width = potential for growth. Tokens that narrow down later will become weak

View OriginalReply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 2h ago

Ecosystem breadth determines the ceiling, and this logic is sound. $onepiece is indeed more resilient to risks than single-currency projects. --- However, $luffy shouldn't be written off too early; niche projects also have their own ways to play. --- It's true that the overall track capacity is large, but it depends on who can truly fill the ecosystem. Empty shells are the most disliked. --- Frankly, it still depends on who can develop applications; having coverage alone is useless, like paper. --- Experienced players all choose ecosystem tokens, but what about retail investors? Someone will always make a profit.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiGreenie

· 2h ago

To be honest, this logic makes sense; ecosystem breadth indeed determines the ceiling. But the key is whether OnePiece can truly implement these application scenarios.

View OriginalReply0