2025-12-26 15:25:26

AT's recent performance has attracted a lot of attention. From the K-line pattern, it is reproducing the early accumulation trajectory of a certain star coin—mild volume at the bottom, and the resistance level is not too heavy.

Interestingly, the capital cost at this stage is not particularly high. Generally speaking, if the market maker really has a plan, they wouldn't want to stop after just one wave. They holding the chips themselves means incurring capital occupation costs, so their actions are usually not so reckless.

According to this logic, there may be a breakthrough trend in about a week. Of course, the market is never 100% certain—false breakouts are also possible, so be prepared for both scenarios.

But the current market is indeed brewing something. Many stories of hundredfold returns all start from signals like these. The question is whether you can catch them.

AT52.59%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TeaTimeTrader

· 5h ago

Oh no, another "start with a hundredfold increase," I say that every time... Wait, the gentle volume increase at the bottom does have some substance, but I've stepped into quite a few fake breakout traps. Let's see within a week, anyway, my wallet is already prepared with two strategies.

View OriginalReply0

SadMoneyMeow

· 5h ago

It's the same story again, with high volume at the bottom and not much pressure... How come I feel like every coin can be explained this way? Just wait to be fooled by a fake breakout and get cut.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaSunglasses

· 5h ago

Bottom mild volume? I've heard this kind of rhetoric too many times. The coins that were said the same way last time, where are they now? Don't just look at the candlestick charts, ask yourself if you can really hold on. If this coin could truly multiply a hundred times, we wouldn't be the ones in it now. But it does seem a bit interesting, let's wait and see first. It's another "about to break out" narrative, hearing it so often that it’s getting old. The logic of capital costs isn't wrong, but the whales will also cut the leeks. Fake breakouts are the norm; actual breakouts are rare. As long as it doesn't break below the support, I'm still in; otherwise, I would have already sold. Everyone dreams of a hundredfold coin, but the probability is really uncertain. Let's see what happens in a week; it's too early to draw conclusions now.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopReserver

· 5h ago

The narrative of gentle volume increase at the bottom, I've heard it a hundred times, and the result? Falling even faster. Wait and see, don't rush to buy in. Damn, it's "brewing" again, I just want to know when it will collapse. Heard the story of a hundredfold increase many times, but the losses are real. But to be fair, this position is indeed a bit interesting. Knowing it's a trap but still jumping in, this is the fate of retail investors. I really can't believe in the capital cost theory; the big players never talk about it that way. Feels like I'm about to get cut again, but I’ll still watch. You all talk so eloquently, but we end up losing everything.

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 5h ago

I've heard the phrase "gentle volume at the bottom" quite a few times, but the result... we'll just have to wait and see. --- There are way too many false breakouts; I've been caught three times already. --- Stories of 100x returns? Ha, those are just survivor bias. Listen to me—wait until you survive first. --- One week? Next week? The week after? Anyway, my stop-loss orders are already set. --- What is the market brewing? Why do I only see my stop-loss prices approaching? --- This logic sounds reasonable, but reality always slaps you in the face, you know. --- I don't know about the cost of capital, but my principal cost is right here.

View OriginalReply0

ZkSnarker

· 5h ago

ngl the "capital cost" angle here is actually... well technically speaking, that's just sunk cost fallacy with extra steps lmao. but yeah the pattern recognition checks out, seen this movie before

Reply0

亏8000刀的男人