In recent years, a growing phenomenon has become increasingly evident—more and more real assets are seeking to go on-chain. Bonds, government bonds, commodities, and even invoices, once tokenized, could channel trillions of dollars into the blockchain world. The question is, how can these assets truly become liquid?



There is a project called Falcon Finance, and their approach is straightforward: they draw from traditional financial collateralized financing models and bring them onto the chain. If you have tokenized real-world assets like government bonds or bonds (industry term: RWA), you can deposit them and proportionally mint stablecoins USDf, without having to sell your holdings.

What problem does this solve? Capital efficiency.

Previously, investors holding bonds would pass the time waiting for maturity; during this period, these assets were essentially frozen, with zero liquidity. Now? They instantly become collateral that can generate income on-chain. For institutional investors, this is akin to gaining flexible on-chain funding sources without relinquishing ownership and yields of their assets. For the entire DeFi ecosystem, it introduces real yield and low-volatility "stabilizers."

Why choose RWA as collateral? Simply put, stability. Compared to pure cryptocurrencies that often fluctuate by 20% or 30%, these assets have lower volatility and clear cash flows, making the overall system risk relatively controllable.

Falcon focuses on integrating such assets, essentially building infrastructure that even institutions dare to enter. The resulting stablecoin USDf is no longer just air; it is backed by a diversified portfolio of income-generating assets. When these RWAs generate returns, the entire system establishes a positive feedback loop.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHerovip
· 3h ago
RWA on-chain is indeed the right direction, but Falcon's model, to be honest, is just the old traditional finance approach wrapped in a new package. Only what can actually run smoothly counts.
View OriginalReply0
0xSoullessvip
· 3h ago
It's the same old story again—institutions entering the market, real assets, stablecoins... I've heard it so many times my ears are calloused.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walkingvip
· 3h ago
RWA and stablecoins again, sounds good but is the actual liquidity guaranteed? --- I support the on-chain bond issuance of government bonds, just worried about institutions coming in to cut the leeks --- Falcon's logic is basically traditional finance with a different disguise, nothing special --- High capital efficiency is good, but who guarantees the authenticity of the assets behind USDf? --- It's still based on trust, and on-chain can't avoid systemic risks either --- Tens of trillions of dollars flowing into blockchain? Come on, let's stabilize the current ecosystem first --- I just want to know what happens if the bonds default, can the algorithm save itself --- RWA collateralized stablecoins feel like transferring traditional financial risks onto the chain --- Low volatility = low returns, why not just buy government bonds directly --- Honestly, the infrastructure that attracts institutional participation is indeed valuable, but how to pass regulatory scrutiny
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologisvip
· 3h ago
This idea is a bit like moving an antique warehouse onto the chain. Those old bonds were like dusty relics, lying in the vault waiting to die. Now, they have suddenly been activated with liquidity... However, it must be acknowledged that the RWA logic is indeed more solid than the pure crypto risk theory. History always repeats itself — at the core of every financial innovation, frankly, is to make dead money come alive.
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collectorvip
· 4h ago
RWA on-chain is an issue that will happen sooner or later, but Falcon's approach indeed correctly aligns the logic of traditional finance Using real assets as collateral to mint stablecoins? Much more reliable than those air coins, finally adding some real gold and silver flavor Wait, is the liquidity of the assets behind this stablecoin really that good? Or is it still a form of freezing? It's easy to say that institutions dare to come in, but how to solve on-chain compliance? That's the real challenge, right? Can USDf truly become the ballast of DeFi? It depends on whether the yields of these RWAs can hold up. Feels like we're back to traditional finance again Tens of trillions of dollars pouring in sounds great, but who will take on the risk? In the end, isn't it retail investors who end up holding the bag? Is this RWA really a bull market narrative or a solid infrastructure upgrade? I'm a bit unsure
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)