🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
🚨 MOST PEOPLE ARE BETTING THIS MARKET WRONG
I’m not betting on who “did something.”
I’m betting on who gets named.
That distinction matters.
Epstein files aren’t criminal verdicts.
They’re document dumps, contacts, mentions, third-party references.
That’s why I lean toward high-profile, globally connected figures, not CEOs or sitting executives.
People like Tony Blair or Al Gore lived in:
– international policy circles
– NGO networks
– elite donor ecosystems
Those environments overlap with mentions, not necessarily actions.
Someone like Jamie Dimon has tight corporate compliance and legal insulation.
Low surface area for random inclusion.
Oprah is a media magnet, but also extremely careful with legal exposure.
Mentions are possible, but markets often overprice visibility.
So my stance:
This isn’t about scandal.
It’s about how wide someone’s paper trail is.
Markets aren’t guessing morality.
They’re pricing probability of appearance.
And that’s why I side with political-global figures over corporate operators.