🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
Recently, a well-known crypto analyst sparked quite a bit of controversy in the community.
He shared optimistic views about the crypto market in 2026, but the response in the comment section was lukewarm. Some bluntly pointed out that such remarks do little to boost his current credibility.
His responses are always sharp, with a touch of sarcasm. However, when someone mentioned his frequent adjustments to ETH target prices and inconsistent logic, he clearly couldn't hold back and directly called the other party a "clown."
This is not an isolated incident. Earlier this year, industry insiders publicly questioned his theoretical framework on ETH; even more painfully, his own team’s internal judgment on next year's market trend leaned more towards a conservative stance.
The lesson from this incident is quite straightforward: analysts can certainly revise their opinions, but the market will not tolerate unconditional forgiveness. When predictions become more frequent but their accuracy drops, that trust naturally diminishes. This is not some profound principle, just the basic law of market operation.