🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
ZK Rollup Ecosystem Overview: In-Depth Analysis of Ethereum Layer 2 Solutions by 2025
The Ethereum Scalability Dilemma and Rollup Breakthrough
As the foundational infrastructure of Web3, Ethereum has attracted millions of users and developers but also falls into the classic scalability paradox. Network congestion causes gas fees to skyrocket and transaction confirmation times to slow, severely limiting user experience in DeFi, NFTs, and other applications. While Ethereum 2.0 is being rolled out in phases, the real solution has arrived—Layer 2 scaling technologies, especially ZK Rollup (Zero-Knowledge Proof Aggregation), are becoming the game changers.
Compared to other Layer 2 solutions, ZK Rollup leverages its mathematical elegance and unparalleled security, rapidly gaining market share. Today, we’ll review the core projects in this space to help you identify investment and usage directions.
How ZK Rollup Works: How Cryptography Saves Ethereum
Underlying Technology: How Zero-Knowledge Proofs Work
Simply put, ZK Rollup is like a “logistics hub”—it batches thousands of transactions off-chain, generates a “receipt” (proof) using zero-knowledge proof technology, and then posts only this receipt on-chain. Recipients don’t need to see every transaction detail to verify that all transactions are valid.
This “receipt” is based on three core properties of Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs):
In cryptographic terms, the verifier can confirm transactions are valid without knowing the specifics—that’s the beauty of “zero knowledge.”
Detailed Execution Process
Off-chain Packaging: User transactions are executed in an independent virtual machine, not occupying Ethereum mainnet resources, resulting in significant cost and speed improvements.
Proof Generation: The aggregator creates a cryptographic proof for the entire batch, which is extremely compact—only a few KB of data.
On-chain Verification: The proof is sent to a smart contract on Ethereum for a one-time verification. Once verified, transactions are finalized.
State Update: The verifier updates the on-chain account states, completing the process.
The brilliance of this design is: The mainnet only needs to verify a single proof instead of validating thousands of individual transactions. The result? Over 100x throughput increase and costs reduced to about 1% of the original.
ZK Rollup vs Optimistic Rollup: Why ZK Is Superior
Both are Layer 2 solutions, but their core logic differs fundamentally:
Key advantage: ZK Rollup offers instant finality—once transactions are bundled into a proof and verified on-chain, they are irreversible, eliminating rollback risks. This is critical for DeFi applications, as a 7-day waiting period is unacceptable in crypto markets.
The ZK Rollup Ecosystem Landscape in 2025
Manta Network (Manta Pacific): The Dark Horse in Privacy DeFi
Key Metrics:
Manta Pacific’s unique selling point is its privacy-first design. Most DeFi applications make your transactions visible to everyone; on Manta, only you know what you’re trading.
How it works: Uses zk-SNARKs to encrypt all transaction details (trading pairs, amounts, wallet addresses), while still allowing verification of each transaction. This enables fully private token swaps and lending operations without fear of being tracked.
Investment perspective: Privacy features are a long-missing capability in DeFi. As regulatory scrutiny intensifies, demand for private transactions will grow. Manta’s first-mover advantage in this vertical is clear.
Risks: Privacy attributes may face regulatory challenges; policy trends should be monitored.
Linea: Mainstream Product by ConsenSys
Key Metrics:
Linea exemplifies traditional big tech entering the ZK space. ConsenSys has invested heavily to ensure quality and ecosystem integration.
Features:
Why to watch: Backed by ConenSys, indicating sustained resource investment and ecosystem support. It’s not a small team experiment but a mainstream infrastructure with major corporate backing.
Polygon zkEVM: The Ambition of an Ecosystem Giant
Key Metrics:
Polygon, a Layer 2 veteran, is further consolidating its position with zkEVM. This isn’t a new product but an upgrade of its existing ecosystem.
Core strengths:
Market position: If you’re bullish on Polygon’s ecosystem, zkEVM is its key growth driver.
Starknet: A Paradigm of STARKs Technology
Key Metrics:
Starknet adopts STARKs technology, highly regarded in cryptography for its no trusted setup requirement.
Technical differences:
Additional advantage: STARKs are believed to resist quantum computing threats, crucial for long-term asset security.
Investment rationale: Safer technical foundation + established ecosystem make it a promising long-term project.
zkSync Era: Matter Labs’ Flagship
Key Metrics:
zkSync is a leading project in the ZK space, with significant funding and ecosystem scale.
Highlights:
Market performance: zkSync community is highly active, with the most dApps, liquidity, and opportunities.
Scroll: The Low-Key High-Throughput Player
Key Metrics:
Scroll focuses on one thing: high throughput. Its goal isn’t “most innovative” but “most efficient.”
Technical features: Uses zk-SNARKs for transaction compression, optimized for high-frequency trading scenarios.
Investment perspective: Lack of a token might seem a downside, but it indicates a focus on product quality rather than fundraising. Future token issuance would be a major event.
Aztec Protocol: Merging Privacy and General Computation
Key Metrics:
Aztec takes a challenging route: supporting public and private execution of smart contracts simultaneously.
Use cases:
Technical barrier: Noir language has a steep learning curve, but mastery enables developers to create applications impossible on other platforms.
ZKFair: The Guardian of Fair Trading
Key Metrics:
ZKFair’s innovation is very targeted: eliminating transaction order manipulation.
What problem it solves: In typical DEXs, miners or arbitrageurs can see your trades, front-run, and profit from it (sandwich attacks). ZKFair uses zero-knowledge proofs to hide transaction details, making such attacks impossible.
Designed for: Professional traders. If you care about slippage and fairness, ZKFair is the top choice.
DeGate V1: A New Direction for Derivatives
Key Metrics:
DeGate doesn’t chase hype but focuses on the niche of derivatives.
Advantages:
Risks: Derivatives are higher risk, suitable for experienced users.
ZetaChain: The Cross-Chain Visionary
Key Metrics:
ZetaChain aims not just to scale but to connect different blockchains.
Technical innovation: Uses zk-SNARKs to build secure cross-chain bridges, enabling assets on Ethereum to flow safely to other chains and vice versa.
Long-term value: If multi-chain becomes mainstream, ZetaChain’s cross-chain infrastructure will be indispensable.
Taiko: The Decentralized Sequencing Revolution
Key Metrics:
Taiko’s innovation addresses the centralization risk in Rollups.
Traditional Rollup issue: Sequencers (nodes that determine transaction order) are often single entities, risking censorship.
Taiko’s solution: Sequencing authority is directly executed by Ethereum validators, fully decentralized. This means:
Future outlook: If Based Sequencing becomes the standard, Taiko’s design could serve as a template.
Real Challenges Facing the ZK Rollup Ecosystem
Every new technology faces growing pains:
1. Technical Complexity Zero-knowledge proofs involve high-level mathematics, leading to:
2. Liquidity Fragmentation Market is split among 11 major ZK Rollups, plus optimized Rollups and other Layer 2s, causing liquidity dispersion. This can lead to high slippage and shallow order books on smaller platforms.
3. Data Availability Dilemma Chain-off transaction data must be verifiable, requiring long-term data availability. Some designs incur high storage costs.
4. Proof Generation Efficiency Creating zero-knowledge proofs demands significant computational resources, potentially bottlenecking networks. Current solutions are not yet elegant enough.
5. Regulatory Uncertainty Some privacy-focused Rollups may face scrutiny from regulators, adding medium-term risks.
6. Governance Complexity Protocol upgrades and parameter adjustments require consensus among multiple stakeholders, often slower than centralized teams.
Outlook for 2025-2026
Short-term (next 6 months)
Mid-term (6-12 months)
Long-term (beyond 1 year)
Final Recommendations
Five core metrics for choosing ZK Rollups:
Based on these, zkSync Era, Linea, Starknet are currently the most promising projects, representing different technical routes and application scenarios.
ZK Rollup is not just a scaling solution; it’s reshaping Ethereum’s future. When this wave of technology matures fully, today’s investments and choices could become tomorrow’s stories.