Token voting definitely improves with more participants backing it up. Early governance struggles usually stem from distribution imbalances rather than the voting mechanism itself. Now that key figures are stepping up their involvement in Solana's ecosystem, we're seeing more momentum around ecosystem development and governance initiatives. This kind of active participation could help address some of the structural challenges that plagued token governance in the beginning.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 2
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
nft_widowvip
· 19h ago
I've said it for a long time, token voting relies on having a larger number of people... the uneven distribution is the real culprit, and now the pro on Solana have finally started to take action, it feels promising.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 20h ago
According to the White Paper data, the distribution imbalance is the real culprit, and the voting mechanism itself is not the problem. Can the involvement of key players in Solana truly break the early governance dilemma? I remain skeptical unless I can see actual improvement data on on-chain voting concentration.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)