Recently, a captivating economic policy debate unfolded at the APEC summit. Former U.S. leaders openly criticized Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, claiming his actions were "too late," which sparked laughter among the business leaders in attendance. However, beneath this seemingly easy exchange lies a profound divergence in economic policy.

The core of this controversy lies in the direction of monetary policy. The former leader advocated for a rapid and significant interest rate cut to drive the economic growth rate to 4%. He even stated the need to prevent the Fed from raising interest rates. However, many economists hold a different view, believing that the new tariff policy may actually hinder economic development.

What does this high-level divergence mean for ordinary investors? Currently, the market seems to be in a dilemma: on one hand, political forces are calling for interest rate cuts to stimulate the economy, while on the other hand, the Fed insists on a prudent and steady policy stance. In this situation, small investors are often the most affected.

In the face of this situation, how should investors respond? First, it is crucial to stay calm. Do not let short-term political rhetoric or market sentiment sway your investment decisions. Second, more attention should be paid to actual economic data and the Fed's official resolutions, rather than solely relying on the statements of political figures. Finally, investors need to be prepared for both scenarios: if the Fed ultimately accelerates rate cuts, there may be a liquidity-driven market; if the Fed maintains its current stance, one should be wary of potential disappointment in the market.

During this special period, the wisest strategy is not to simply take sides, but to maintain a flexible investment attitude. Keeping sufficient cash reserves and being ready to seize market opportunities may be the best response at present.