🚗 #GateSquareCommunityChallenge# Round 2 — Which coin is not listed on Gate Launchpad❓
Time to prove if you’re a true Gate veteran!
💰 Join the challenge — 5 lucky winners will share $50 in GT!
👉 How to participate:
1️⃣ Follow Gate_Square
2️⃣ Like this post
3️⃣ Comment with your answer
🗓️ Deadline: October 8, 2025, 24:00 (UTC+8)
Beyond the Hype: Lagrange's ZK Revolution for Verifiable AI and Cross-Chain Data
I've been digging into this Lagrange project, and honestly, I'm both intrigued and skeptical. They're building what they call an "infinite proving layer" for Web3 - essentially decentralized zero-knowledge infrastructure for verifiable proofs across chains, DeFi, and AI. Sounds fancy, but can they deliver?
Their LA token just launched after raising $17.2M and getting listed on major exchanges. They're positioning themselves as the backbone for verifiable AI through their ZK Prover Network, ZK Coprocessor, and DeepProve zkML system. Big promises, as usual in crypto.
What caught my attention is how they claim their system can verify not just what happened (like traditional oracles) but why and how - crucial distinctions for AI verification. Their architecture supposedly allows verification of AI inferences, SQL queries, and cross-chain data without exposing sensitive information.
The tech sounds promising - a globally distributed network of provers generating and validating ZK proofs. LA token holders can delegate to nodes, creating that familiar crypto incentive loop: more demand for verifiable AI → more proofs → more rewards for operators.
Their practical examples are interesting. Imagine a DAO needing to verify governance data from another chain. Their system fetches the state, runs computations off-chain, produces a ZK proof validated on-chain, and voilà - trustless verification. For AI, their DeepProve system generates zero-knowledge proofs of ML inference while preserving privacy.
The token economics are predictable - fees for proofs paid in LA or other tokens (converted to LA), distributed to operators and delegators. They've created some auction mechanism called DARA to match proof requests with operators.
I'm most skeptical about their timeline. They claim DeepProve will soon support major LLM models and are promising proofs of training, fine-tuning, fairness, and reasoning. That's a massive technical undertaking.
By 2030, they envision any AI system generating cryptographic receipts - ZK proofs of their operations. Noble goal, but we've heard similar promises from countless crypto projects that disappeared into the void.
The partnerships with 0G Labs, Matter Labs, NVIDIA, and Intel lend some credibility. But the real test will be delivering scalable, production-grade infrastructure that actually works for real-world applications, not just crypto speculation.
Their vision is compelling - but can they transform ZK from crypto curiosity to mainstream necessity? I'll believe it when I see actual proofs, not just promises.