I must say this perspective is quite profound. Most people indeed just pick a side, few truly see through that these two paths are actually two different playstyles of the same game.
Brother, your angle is fresh. The privacy faction and stablecoin faction clash every day, but they're actually walking the same path...
Speaking of which, is it really impossible to have both stability and privacy? It feels like someone will break the deadlock eventually.
XMR's approach is indeed impressive, but in reality LUSD-type solutions have higher adoption rates... it's contradictory.
This is the so-called "censorship resistance trilemma", I've heard about it before, but now that you mention it, it does feel different.
Wait, that's not right—we're talking about the best tools, but we still need to actually live to use them, right?
Hardcore perspective, but most crypto people are still thinking about how to make quick money. Who's thinking about these deeper things?
XMRとLUSD/BOLDは追求する方向性において実は同じ対立の側面を持っている。ただし、その手段は全く異なる——しかしこれを知っている人は多くない。なぜなら、DeFiステーブルコインの深い研究者とプライバシーに執着する人はほとんど交わらないからだ。
主権的な検閲抵抗通貨の形態には、結局二つの道がある：一つは価格変動が激しいがプライバシーは無敵、もう一つは安定を保つが完全に透明である。これがゲームの全てだ。
結局のところ、暗号通貨の最も凄いところは——それが政府の権力拡大に対抗する最も効果的なツールであるという点だ。