09:10 Watching TRUMPUSDT: Current price 3.605, 24h -2.80%. Sentiment is cold (Fear&Greed 26). In this environment, "bounces that don't extend/breaks that pull back" oscillations are more likely to occur, so I prefer to establish the framework first and respond according to price levels, rather than guessing direction based on emotion.

I'm only watching two key levels: A Confirmation level 3.76900000, B Break level 3.59200000. When price is below A, I treat it as a retracement zone and prioritize observing volume and pullback speed; only if it effectively breaks above A and holds can it upgrade from "watching" to "considering following." Conversely, if it breaks below B again and stays below it, the short-term trend must acknowledge weakness—better to do less than to force it.

By the way, there's been a lot of news recently about geopolitical conflicts and regulatory stance, but I treat it as background noise, not verified facts, and certainly not trading signals. These narrative coins are more easily swayed by news, and the more chaotic it gets, the more I need to restrain position size and frequency. This is not a confirmation signal, just an observation framework.

For reference only, not investment advice.

Would you rather see it stabilize above B first before considering a bounce, or directly break above A with volume and then consider participating?