The Federal Reserve's power transition is entering a "delicate stage," and the key is not just personnel changes

Recently, there has been an interesting signal from the United States.
Donald Trump stated that even if Jerome Powell remains on the Board of Governors after his term as Chair ends, he "doesn't care," with the main goal of ensuring Kevin Warsh's smooth succession.
On the surface, it appears to be a simple personnel change, but behind the scenes, it's more complicated.
Regarding the timing:
Powell's chairmanship ends on May 15th,
but his term as a governor extends until 2028.
He has also explicitly stated that he might stay on for a while longer.
This brings up a practical issue:
Even if the chair changes, the influence of existing policies may not disappear immediately.
In other words, this is not a "change of personnel, change of direction" situation, but more like a transitional period where old and new forces coexist.
My understanding is that the market should focus not only on "who becomes the chair," but also on the internal coordination and bargaining within the decision-making layer.
Because in this structure, policy momentum may not undergo extreme changes but lean more toward balance and compromise.
Many people like to attribute market changes to a single person, but the reality is often:
What truly influences the direction is a whole set of mechanisms, not a single role.
The same applies to investments—
Instead of betting on one person, it's better to understand the entire picture. #WCTC交易王PK #美国寻求战略比特币储备 #比特币ETF期权持仓限额增4倍 $BSB $SKYAI